What Justice Means to Me

In social institutions, evaluator is the very first virtue. On the other hand, truth would be considered to be of systems of thought. In the trip of theories, genuine revisions could be d iodine if it is found to be untrue. Even if the theory seems to toilsome elegantly, changes would be required on it. The same thing applies to laws and institutions. If these laws and institutions are untrue, they would be reformed, or worst, they would be abolished. Utilitarianism states that a moral action is the greatest cheeseparing for the greatest number of volume (Mill, 1863).But each and every individualistic has the ability to discern based on in force(p)ice that the wellbeing of a whole society does not often overrule the wellbeing of its citizen. arbiter rejects the idea that an individual could lose his freedom for the benefit of the other individuals. In a society, jurist must provide the equality which the citizen or the people should receive. Their rights should be protecte d by umpire and that inequalities are reduced, if not totally removed (Rawls, 1999). Justice for me is comelyness.It is a way to give the things that is repayable to a person or an individual who experiences unjust treatment. Each and every individual should experience equality especially with regards to rights and liberty, comparable to that which is experienced by other people. In addition to this, if there is the presence of social and economic inequalities, it should be reformed. The inequalities should be arranged in a manner as to be rationally anticipated to be to everyones advantage. Also, it should be fixed as to make positions or offices open to everybody, and not only to a particularized individual or group of individuals.In a case say by Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez, an individual named Beatrice Norton who was fourteen years old worked in a like fiber hoagy just like her mother. Few years after, she had halt from working due to problems with regards to her health. Exposure to the cotton plant dust in the cotton loaf had resulted to a disease called brownish lung. Brown lung can is a chronic disease, and if it gets out of hand, it could be fatal. The symptoms of brown lung are similar to bronchial asthma and emphysema. Due to this disease, she was not able to work anymore and provide cash for herself and to her family.As such(prenominal), she asks for the governments help in giving justice to what she had experienced. More specifically, she wanted to receive stability compensations from the government. Another case dialog about Mrs. Vinnie Ellisons maintain who to a fault worked in a cotton mill. Her husband had experienced difficulties in breathing and her husbands health was in serious problem fulfilling his job due to this. Mrs. Ellisons husband was fired because of this. Aside from being jobless, Mrs. Ellisons husband had no pension, as such, they had difficulty living (Andre and Velasquez, Spring 1990).In these two incide nts or cases, some(prenominal) Beatrice Norton and Mrs. Vinnie Elison, only wanted what is due to them or to their loved one. They wanted to be treated equally or fairly as to what they had experienced. They had worked for the cotton mill for years and morally speaking, the victims should be given compensations or financial help. In this way, their efforts, labor and loyalty to the company could be rewarded. In a just society, they should not be treated indifferently and that justice should protect them as well, just like how it protects other laborers or workers experiencing other diseases.As a Criminal Justice professional, I would see to it that they would be given whats due to them. I would try to investigate and check if theres any fault, mistake, neglects or shortcomings done by either Beatrice Norton and Mrs. Vinnie Elison or the cotton mill. I could readily give help or assistance to the victims of the brown lung in receiving at least a small compensation to give birth for their medications. The improvement of their health could also be pushed through as deliberations and investigations go on.I would also help in granting pension to these victims if it is found that they had not committed any shortcomings as to endanger their own selves to the disease. In the case of the cotton mill, I could assist them in finding a fitting compensation or pension for the victims without incurring much loss to the mill. Their policies could also be revised in order to adapt to these problems in the future. sure arctic regulations can be pushed through the court for the cotton mill to create or improve existing health or safety regulations so that the well-being of the workers could be addressed.If the court finds that the victims did not follow such regulations then, they may not receive what they want amply since it is not due to them. Distributing wealth and good things in life that is equally deserved by one could be thought through common sense be given based on moral ravage. Justice is happiness agree to virtue. While it is recognized that this ideal can never be fully carried out, it is the appropriate conception of distributive justice, at least as a prima facie.As a Criminal Justice professional that considers that justice is integrity, this conception is already eliminated or disregarded. Identifying the necessary criteria in this situation seems to be impossible. In addition to this, from the point of view of distributing according to virtue, moral desert and legitimate expectations are neither eminent nor identifiable. Therefore, it can be a fact that individuals who take part in certain arrangements receive claims from one another because of the existing symmetricalnesss which were made.In the case of the brown lung cancer, certain agreements could be arranged in order to come up with a fair decision that would not push one side to the losing end. By creating an agreement between the two conflicting identities, they could re ceive claims and equality or fairness can be served. Furthermore, the principles of justice as fairness that maintains a innate structure do not pertain to moral desert. Through justice as fairness, there would be no predisposition of share scattering that would keep up a correspondence with it.