Friday, May 3, 2019
An essay developing the depth of critical analysis of one particular
An developing the depth of critical analysis of one grumpy theoretical approach in which the student will reflect on how the concepts can be tie in t - Essay ExampleHowever, the key point is the assumption that the person already has the solution to well-nigh any problem the therapists task is to guide the client toward that solution (McMillan, 2004).Developed in the 1930s by Carl Rogers, person-centred therapy partially evolved from the psychoanalytic theories that had dominated the mental science in the beginning of twentieth century. However, the new approach also departed substantially from the classical psychoanalysis. Thus, Rogers did not accept the detached place of the therapist conducting the therapy the emphasis on maintaining a supportive environment, coupled with the need to establish closer individual(prenominal) kindred between the therapist and client were other innovative features of the new approach. Even Rogers uptake of the term client pursued the goal to e liminate the traditional perception of the highly hierarchical patient-doctor relationship in PCT, it was precisely the client, not therapist who determined the overall direction of treatment, while the therapist command the client with the help of questions (Bruno, 1977). These basic principles of PCT are similar to those that shape the core of the original psychological theory of Carl Roger.Rogers humanistic theory developed as an offshoot of his method of client-centred (later called person-centred) therapy. The fundamental of personality is psychological reality, the subjective experience according to which the reality is interpreted by human beingnesss, and any person is an mix in unity that can never be divided into separate part Rogers view of human doings is exquisitely rational. Humanistic perspectives actively criticized psychoanalytic theory for portraying people as being directed only by their unconscious wishes and irrational forces. They also did not support the be haviourist condition because the latter viewed people as biological robots who are mechanically programmed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment