Ethical Dillemma Worksheet

1. What is the honorable issue or problem? lay the issue succinctly.The ethical issue develops when the fair play is neutered in the second or signed run into report. The officer altered the report to state that they had actu all(prenominal)y witnessed the married man charter and park the car, although they had non.2. What argon the near important incidents? Which facts curb the most stroller on the ethical decision presented? overwhelm any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts. The fact that the prime(prenominal) report had said the officers precisely felt the vehicle with a raw hood, and only witnessed the economise walk up to the home. Is the first report really had non been signed off it whitethorn have been because they would non have a cocktail dress given that the officers did not witness the economize actually driving the vehicle. Given that, the maintain would have won the nerve and socially and politically it would show weakness within the surgical incision, because the officers made an arrest without meeting trustworthy criteria for arrest. The second report had stated different, that the officers witnessed the save driving and park as they pulled up.3. describe each claimant (key actor) who has an enkindle in the conclusion of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the righteous comp 1ntive rolethe individual contemplating an ethical course of attainwhat obligation is owed to the claimant? Why? Claimant(key actor) Obligation (owed to the claimant) status (What does the claimant hope settlement happen?) The officers Fidelity, legal expert The officers hope they forget win the case of DWI, although they did not witness the economize driving. The husband Fidelity, humanity Hopes to stay out of discard and win the case against him since he was not witnessed driving patch intoxicated. The wife Fidelity, beneficence Hopes to keep her husband out of jai l. fri send awayship arbiter Hopes that criminal justice force play and system allow for be equal to keep offenders off the streets as to not cause wrong to innocent citizens. prosecutor Justice, non-injury Hopes to gain the fair play of the matter as to not cause flaws in the justice system, and achieve absolute justice for all parties involved.Evaluating selections4. What are two picks for the scenario? One alternative can be a inconclusive card that you ordinarily may not consider an option because of potential implications. both should be within free leave behind and control of the same moral agent. pick A ersatz B Keep report physical body one and not commit charges against the husband. attend through with report upshot two, and file charges against the husband. 5. Respond to the following questions ground on your developed alternatives.Alternative A Alternative BWhat are the beaver- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative? Best-the husband wil l take this opportunity as a draw of luck and rehabilitate. The department and officers will not look bad for making an arrest without proper protocal. Worst- the husband expands to calculate while intoxicated and harms another soul, the first arrest may come to luminosity and the prosecutor may be reprimanded for not perusing charges the first time Best-the husband will be taken off the streets and not allowed the opportunity to drive while intoxicated potentially causing harm to himselfand others. Worst- the truth will come to on the loose(p) and prosecutors and police officers are reprimanded for not utter the truth to begin with. Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.Yes, citizens can be harmed if accidents occur should the husband continue to drive while intoxicated. The wife may continue to be battered by the intoxicated husband. The family may be harmed if the husband is arrested and he is the only source of income. The department may be harmed should the truth be known. Would abide by an idea or value such as personal, professional, or religious fuddle the alternative invalid? Professionally it may allow for an intoxicated driver to be on the streets, causing public harm.Professionally, religiously, and personally, it would be wrong to move forward with a falsified report.Applying Ethical Guidelines6. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative. Guidelines based on the pull through itself Alternative A Alternative B Should this alternative become a master or policy that everyone in this stain should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant) Yes No Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic single? (Kant) Yes Yes Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kants good will) Yes No Does this alter native testify a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need? Yes No Guidelines based on consequences Alternative A Alternative B Is the good that results from this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mills harm principle) No No Is any harm brought slightly by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm) YesYes Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism) Yes Yes To what score is this alternative based on the moral agents own best interest? (ethical egoism)Which alternative will pay off the superlative benefitor the least(prenominal) amount of harmfor the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism) Alternative number one generates the greatest benefit or least harm.Ethical closing Making7. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision. Alternative A allows th e husband to make better choices, as sound as keeps the police officers and the prosecutor from lying. The truth will be known and it will not make the police department look irresponsible for not fetching proper steps to arrest with able evidence.